Ask

Back on a spreadsheet after bouncing off two apps, what does an app do that a sheet genuinely can't?

Cost is worth stating plainly since you'd be paying again. The well-known subscription ones sit around $99 to $109 a year now: one of them is $109 annually or $14.99 monthly, and it lets you share the subscription with up to six people, which matters if there's a household involved.

Against twenty minutes a week, that's roughly $2 an hour of your time back. That's either obviously worth it or obviously not depending on whether the app fixes the skipping, which no subscription can promise.

84 · in/budget-apps ·

the contract says the client owns the deliverable, how do people carve out the reusable core before signing?

Going to disagree with the assumption that this is a fight. I asked three former clients directly whether they minded me selling a generic version of the tooling, plainly, over email.

All three said yes without hesitation. Two asked for a discount if they ever moved onto the product, which I gave. One asked me to confirm none of their data or business rules went with it, which was reasonable and true.

People assume the client will object and never test the assumption. A client who hired you for three days of work does not think of themselves as owning a software company.

118 · in/service-to-saas ·

Joint account plus two personal ones, an app that shares the joint without merging every coffee

On the subscription question specifically: at least one of the mainstream ones lets you share a single subscription across up to six people, and it's $109 a year or $14.99 a month, so a couple is paying one fee rather than two. That was the deciding factor for us over paying twice for parallel accounts.

Worth checking the sharing terms before you buy rather than after, the pricing pages are clearer about this than the marketing pages.

128 · in/budget-apps ·

Free calorie tracker that is not upselling me a coach every third screen: what are people using?

Cronometer's free tier is what I settled on and the trade off is clear: the food database is smaller and more curated, so fewer junk crowdsourced entries but more manual adding for own brand products, and the micronutrient detail is far better than anything else free. If your priority is that supermarket own brands scan reliably in the UK, look at anything built on Open Food Facts, since that database is open and community maintained and its coverage of European retail products is much better than the American focused apps. I ran both for a fortnight and kept the one with fewer wrong entries rather than the one with more entries.

94 · in/macros ·

Solar credit did not come back as a refund - the software carried most of it forward, is that expected?

Worth adding the distinction that trips up half the people asking this, because there are two different credits and they behave differently. The residential clean energy credit, the solar and battery one, is nonrefundable but carries forward. The energy efficient home improvement credit, the one for heat pumps, insulation and windows, is also nonrefundable but the IRS says explicitly that you cannot apply any excess to future tax years. So heat pump people who assumed they had a carryforward do not have one, and it simply evaporates.

148 · in/home-energy ·

Nine months in, pull-ups went 4 to 11 and my arms measure exactly the same

You answered your own question in the middle of the post. Eating at maintenance is a decision to keep your current amount of tissue, and it works - you kept it.

Strength went up because your nervous system got better at the movements, which is most of what happens in the first year regardless of training style. Size needs a surplus, and it doesn't need a big one. This isn't a bodyweight-versus-weights thing at all; a barbell trainee at maintenance would be sitting here with the same tape measure.

248 · in/calisthenics ·

Both standups landed at 9:15 and neither manager will move theirs

Ask one of them to let you go async, and ask for it as a working style thing rather than a scheduling thing. The phrasing that has worked for me three times: I get my best focused work done first thing, I'd like to post my update in the channel by 9:00 each day instead of attending, and I'll join live on Mondays and any day there's something to discuss.

Most managers say yes to that because a written update is genuinely more useful to them than watching someone recite it. Pick whichever team already communicates in writing a lot, that's the one where it'll land.

312 · in/two-jobs ·

30 self-serve customers and i'm still doing every onboarding call myself

I'd argue against automating them yet, and I know that's the unpopular position at 30 customers.

Those calls are the only place you watch someone use your product without a filter. I killed mine at about 40 customers because I was busy, and my roadmap got noticeably worse within a quarter - I started building things people asked for in emails, which is a much more biased sample than watching someone get stuck in silence.

What I'd do instead: cut the call to 20 minutes by pre-doing the setup yourself before they join, and keep the watching part. Automate the clicking, not the conversation.

134 · in/service-to-saas ·

If the app is free, what is it doing with my transaction data?

Politely disagreeing with the implied "paid equals private." Paying changes the incentive, it doesn't change the policy, and the policy is the only thing that binds them.

Read the section about aggregated or de-identified data specifically. Plenty of paid products still reserve the right to sell anonymised spending trends, which is a real market. If a paid app's policy is silent on that, that's the same silence a free one gives you, just more expensively.

126 · in/budget-apps ·

Client insists on WordPress - cheap shared host or managed WP, and what is the real yearly number?

Going to argue the unpopular one. For five pages and a blog updated twice a year, WordPress is a maintenance liability you have volunteered to own. It needs core updates, plugin updates, a security posture and a backup regime, forever, for a site that changes twice a year. A static site with a small hosted editor, or even a site builder the client can log into, costs less to run and cannot be compromised through a plugin.

If the client insists on WordPress because they have heard of it, that is a real reason and you should charge for it. But do not pretend it is the cheap option.

169 · in/hosting-and-domains ·

Everything in my product feels core - how did you decide what goes behind the top tier?

Disagreeing with gating collaboration and export, which is where a lot of people reach first. The people who invite colleagues and pull data into their own reports are the ones who make you spread inside a company, and charging them for it slows down the mechanism that grows the account. Charge for volume, charge for the corporate requirements, and let the evangelism features be free.

169 · in/pricing-tiers ·