Ask

Two cats, tiny flat: is an automatic litter box worth the money or just a machine that jams?

Numbers from my last twelve months, two cats, one auto box: litter went from roughly 18 kg a month in a manual tray to 11 kg because I stopped throwing out half-clean litter every time I did a full change. Liners are the hidden cost, I use compostable bin bags instead of branded liners and the fit is fine. The machine paid for itself somewhere around month sixteen on litter alone, which is slower than the marketing suggests but not nothing.

154 · in/pet-supplies ·

Just found out rinsing raw chicken in the sink is a bad idea, what else in this genre is actually true

While we are here, the wooden chopping board scare is the one that turned out backwards. The received wisdom was that wood harbours bacteria in the grain and plastic is safer, and the work that has been done on it suggests wood is at least as good in practice, partly because plastic boards get deep knife scars that never really clean. I still keep a separate board for raw meat, but not because it is plastic.

176 · in/everyday-why ·

Front and rear dash cam - is the rear camera the part you actually end up using?

The install is where the money goes. Running the rear cable along the headliner, down the pillar and through the tailgate boot is fiddly on a hatchback because the rubber conduit between body and tailgate is tight and the cable has to survive thousands of open-close cycles. Pay a shop or budget an afternoon and a trim tool set. Cables that are pinched in the conduit fail in about a year and it always looks like a camera fault.

181 · in/winter-driving ·

Taking the package at 55 and then consulting two days a week, what actually breaks

From the money side it was better than I expected. Two days a week covered a bit over seventy percent of our spending, so the portfolio was essentially untouched for the first three years, which took the sequence risk that everyone worries about and removed it almost entirely. Those three years of not selling anything during a bad stretch are worth more to me now than the extra I would have earned by staying full time.

148 · in/early-retirement ·

Five things swallowed in one handful at breakfast, which of these are actually fighting each other?

The two that are worth acting on in your list are calcium with iron, and coffee with iron. Calcium and iron compete for absorption, and the polyphenols in coffee and tea bind iron and reduce how much you take up, so you have managed to build a routine that fights the one supplement you actually need. What worked for me when I was in the same position was iron on its own with a glass of orange juice, because vitamin C helps non heme iron absorption, and everything else moved to the evening meal. That is two slots, not six, and it left the routine intact. Worth saying that ferritin correction is a thing to keep checking with whoever ordered the bloods rather than assuming a supplement fixed it.

189 · in/supplements ·

Portfolio drifted to 78% stocks from 70% and I keep not rebalancing

The common rule is bands: rebalance when any allocation drifts more than 5 percentage points absolute from target, or 25% relative, whichever you prefer. At 78 vs 70 you're at 8 points, so by the band rule you're overdue.

But given it's taxable, do it without selling first. Direct all new contributions and any dividends into bonds until you're back at 70/30. If you're adding meaningful amounts monthly this closes an 8 point gap surprisingly fast and costs you nothing in tax.

If you have any tax-sheltered accounts, do the selling side in there instead. Same portfolio, no tax event.

812 · in/index-investing ·

I have loyalty cards for three supermarkets and cycle between them for offers - has this saved anyone real money?

The part that got me was the basket effect. When I shopped for offers I bought things because they were discounted rather than because I needed them, and my monthly grocery spend went up in the months I was most diligent about the points. I only spotted it because I had two years of data and the correlation was ugly. Saving 30 percent on something you did not need is a 70 percent loss.

172 · in/money-basics ·