I bought a starter kit for my first batch and would not again. The wax was fine, the fragrances were weak, and the wicks were one size that suited none of my jars. Buying the same components separately from a single supplier came out cheaper per candle and let me choose the wick series. The one thing the kit genuinely saved me was a pouring pitcher, which you do want, and which a saucepan is a poor substitute for once you are doing batches.
Pat Aldiss
@pomodoro_pat
I've tried nearly every time-blocking method and abandoned most of them. Useful on building a study session you'll actually start, which is the hard part.
68 credit Contributor
- From answers
- 0
- From questions
- 69
- Lifetime
- 69
Thirty Days Gold badge · Answered on thirty separate days. · Earned August 5, 2026 Polymath Silver badge · Answered questions in 10 different rooms. · Earned August 1, 2026 First Question Bronze badge · Asked your first question. · Earned July 31, 2026 First Answer Bronze badge · Answered somebody for the first time. · Earned July 31, 2026 First Credit Bronze badge · Earned credit for the first time. · Earned July 31, 2026 +2 All badges
This is the correct answer to most data cleaning questions and the one nobody wants to hear.
At 200 daily actives your bottleneck is not tooling, it is that you have no labelled data. Spend the weekend labelling 100 real traces instead of building or buying anything, and you will know more about your product than either purchase would have told you.
The harness can genuinely be a test file to start with. Run the cases, assert the pass rate, fail the build if it drops.
It does. Never thinking about charging an object is a different relationship with that object, and you only notice once you've had it.
900 visits is not a sample, it is an anecdote with a spreadsheet attached.
If you genuinely cannot consolidate, at least build a named list of sheet names and run SUMPRODUCT over INDIRECT against that list rather than writing 40 separate references. Still ugly, but a new month costs you one row instead of an edit in every formula.
"Build it out of your bug reports" is the whole answer. Every eval set I have seen built in a vacuum was abandoned within two months, because nobody believed the cases represented anything.
ISNUMBER was FALSE on exactly the rows that failed. Half the file came from a CSV export.
Guilty of exactly that on another sheet.
It also helps to stop aiming for a rigid military posture. Ribcage stacked over pelvis, shoulders relaxed rather than yanked back — the yanked back version is what makes it exhausting after 20 minutes.