Check the capability tags before the benchmarks, because they can end the comparison outright.
kimi-k3, kimi-k2.7-code, kimi-k2.6 and qwen3.5 all carry a vision tag. glm-5.2 is listed with tools and thinking but no vision. If part of your loop is pasting a screenshot of a broken UI or a stack trace from a screen grab, that single tag decides it for you and nothing else in this thread matters.
One more thing to rule out before you escalate: TLS inspection. If your corporate line runs an inspecting proxy, it can rewrite or mangle the download stream and you get symptoms that look exactly like this. You said you reproduced on a home line too, which mostly rules it out: but say so explicitly when you open the ticket, because it is the first thing they will ask and it will cost you a day of back-and-forth if you leave it out.
One caveat on founder-led at 12 hours: protect the build hours. Calls expand to fill everything, you ship nothing for two months, then the calls dry up because you've got nothing new to show. I block two evenings for calls and two for building and I don't let them trade against each other.
And someone can slash the liner for fun without stealing anything, which happened to a colleague. Whether that's a real risk depends entirely on where you park.
That explains the fractions, thank you. Is the per-tensor layout something I can inspect, or do I have to trust whatever the publisher wrote in the table?
You are literally submitting twice. The form action fires and your onClick fires. Delete the onClick - the form already calls it with the FormData.
useFormStatus reads the status of the form it is inside. If you call it in the same component that renders the <form>, it has no parent form to read and you get pending: false forever. Pull the button into <SubmitButton /> and call the hook there.
After that, still add an idempotency key. A user on a bad connection will double submit no matter how good your disabled state is.
If it genuinely isn't regulated data, the honest answer to the client might be that the residency requirement costs them money for no measurable reduction in risk. Sometimes they still want it and that's fine, but say it once, in writing.
It works fine if you do whole rooms rather than half a room. I did bedrooms and the home office first and left the hallway and bathroom dumb, and honestly the hallway never needed it.
Mine broke down as a coordinator stick for about the price of a takeaway, contact and motion sensors at ten to fifteen each, smart plugs at under a tenner, and bulbs anywhere from six to fifty depending on how much you care about colour. Then the heating happened. Radiator valves were forty to sixty each and I have nine radiators, which turned a two hundred pound project into a seven hundred pound one on its own. Sensors and plugs are cheap, anything that moves water or gas is not.
Practical mechanics: send overpayments as a separate transfer with the reference the lender specifies, not as extra on top of your direct debit, and get written confirmation of how it was applied each time. Two of mine were sat in a suspense account for months doing nothing because the reference was wrong.
I thought R2's whole pitch was no request charges - the entire point is that you only pay for storage and the egress is free. Are you sure this is not something else on the invoice mislabelled?
Give them a filled dashboard before you ask for anything. Sample data, a demo workspace, a read-only tour with realistic numbers in it - whatever lets them see the thing working before they hand over access.
An empty state is a request for trust from someone who has seen nothing yet. Once they have clicked through a populated view and understood what they get, the connect step stops being an act of faith and becomes an obvious next action. This was the single biggest change I have made to activation, bigger than every copy edit combined.
Second thing: ask for the narrowest scope that lets you show one useful screen, and expand later when they want the feature that needs it.
This bit me. My connect rate was 14% from one aggregator and 58% from the docs page, and the blended number told me nothing except that I was averaging two different populations. Once I split it, the fix was to stop counting the aggregator traffic as signups at all.
The balance report, not the gross volume chart. Gross volume is money customers were charged, before anything is taken out and before anything settles. It is not a number you can spend.
Once the underlying data is fixed, add a helper column with =EOMONTH(A2,0) or =TEXT(A2,"yyyy-mm") and group on that instead. It survives refreshes and it sorts correctly, which the built-in grouping does not always do when your data spans multiple years.
Did this wrong on a smaller project: json documents up to about 800kb in a D1 column, no separate table. It worked for two months and then the dashboard query that listed 50 recent items started timing out, because it was pulling 40mb through the worker to render a list of titles.
The fix took an afternoon and I felt stupid the whole time. Metadata and payload never live in the same row unless you always want both.
Rule of thumb: actions are for your own UI, route handlers are for anything with another consumer. Mixing that up is how people end up trying to version a server action.
The change that moved my numbers was cutting touch one down to four lines with exactly one question in it. Mine used to have a paragraph about the product and a link to book a call, and it got nothing. Now it is: the specific thing I noticed on their site, one sentence on what I do about it, one question they can answer with a yes or a no, and my name. No link at all in the first email.
Replies went from about two per hundred to about six per hundred, and more of them were actual sentences rather than one word brush-offs.
One thing to sort out before you need it: what happens the week you are away. An autoresponder that says I am away until the 14th, urgent issues go to this address, everything else gets answered on the 15th is fine. People are remarkably relaxed about a one person company being one person, as long as they know it in advance rather than after four days of silence.
The other half is a status page you can update from your phone. When something breaks while you are on a train, one line there is worth twenty individual replies you cannot write.
Treat the folder as append-only once a migration has been applied anywhere but your laptop. Editing an applied file is where every "checksum mismatch, the migration has been modified" support thread comes from.
Same, except I kept one thing in the dead week: ten minutes on paper writing what the good week is for. Otherwise Saturday morning goes to deciding, and deciding eats the whole first block.
If you insist on keeping it in the app: raising bodySizeLimit works, and it is genuinely fine for a 2 MB avatar. For 12 MB over a phone connection you are paying function wall-clock for the whole transfer, and a user on bad hotel wifi can sit there long enough to hit your duration limit. The failure mode is a timeout after 90 seconds of uploading, which is the most infuriating possible error.
And check whether the $2.95 requires a three-year prepay. A lot of those cheap tiers only exist at a 36-month commitment and the monthly rate is a different number entirely.
Politely disagreeing with the top answer, because you are describing exactly one broken sensor and one automation you cannot write. Buy a sensor that speaks HomeKit natively and write the heating rule as two simpler automations, and you are done in an evening instead of adopting a hobby. I moved to Home Assistant for the same two reasons and now I maintain an entire second system, which I like, but let us be honest about what it is.
I waited for mine to die on purpose to see how long it took. It took four and a half years, and it failed at 11pm before a trip, and I had no image, no notes and no idea which config file I had edited in 2020. The board cost nothing to replace. Rebuilding the setup from memory cost me most of a day.