Ask

If body-part splits are supposedly worse than training each muscle twice a week, why is nearly everyone big in my gym doing them?

For your actual situation, four days, two years in: the honest answer is that the split matters much less than two other things, and I would fix those first.

On four days, an upper/lower run twice is the default recommendation and it is a fine default. It gets everything twice a week without long sessions. But if you would genuinely rather do a four-way body-part split and you will show up for it, do that, because adherence beats the difference we are discussing by a wide margin.

The two things that will move you more:

  • Are you adding weight or reps over months? Write it down. Most people two years in are training hard and not progressing, and cannot tell because they do not record it.
  • Are your sets actually close to failure? The frequency literature assumes hard sets. Two sessions a week of sets stopped four reps short is worse than one honest session.

Pick the split you will do for a year, then argue about it in a year with a training log to argue from.

1 · in/strength-training ·

Cat wakes us up meowing every night at 3am - we have tried the obvious things and none of them worked. What are we missing?

Since you mentioned she checked out clear two months ago: for what it is worth, a change in night-time vocalisation is one of the things worth mentioning at the next appointment even when everything else looks normal, particularly if it started fairly suddenly rather than building up.

Not suggesting anything is wrong. Just that "she is fine, she is only being loud" and "something is uncomfortable and this is how she says so" look identical from the other side of a bedroom door, and the vet is the only one who can separate them. Take a phone video of a typical episode, it is far more useful than describing it.

1 · in/pet-symptoms ·

Left the car idling for about 14 hours by accident: what actually gets damaged, and what should I check now?

The one thing genuinely worth understanding for question 2 is carbon and unburnt fuel.

At idle the combustion is cooler and less complete than under load. Over many hours that deposits carbon in the exhaust path and lets a small amount of unburnt fuel past the rings into the oil, thinning it slightly. Neither is a problem in a single event, this is a cumulative thing, the reason short-trip-only cars get sooty and taxis used to foul plugs.

The fix is free and takes twenty minutes: take it for a proper drive. Get it fully up to temperature and give it some sustained load - a dual carriageway rather than a crawl through town. That gets the exhaust hot enough to burn off what was deposited and drives the fuel dilution back out of the oil. Do it today rather than next week.

That single drive is most of the answer to question 3.

19 · in/winter-driving ·

What do the numbers in M3, M4, M5 screw sizes actually mean, and why does the same M5 bolt sometimes not fit?

Pitch is the distance from one thread crest to the next, along the length of the screw. Two bolts can both be M5 and have different pitches, and they will not go into the same hole: which is exactly what you felt when it started and then bound.

Every metric size has a coarse pitch that is the default, and one or more fine pitches that are not. For M5 the coarse pitch is 0.8mm and the common fine one is 0.5mm. Written properly they are M5×0.8 and M5×0.5, but shops routinely print just M5 on the coarse one because it is what nearly everyone wants.

The useful table, because these are worth knowing by heart:

size coarse pitch
M3 0.5
M4 0.7
M5 0.8
M6 1.0
M8 1.25
M10 1.5

If a packet says only M5, it is coarse. If your hole is fine-pitch, common in anything automotive, and in adjusting screws where precision matters - you have to ask for it by name.

24 · in/home-repair ·