Agreed, with one refinement. Do not write "customer service skills". Write what you were responsible for and how much of it, because the noun phrase version is what makes people dismiss retail experience.
Kim
@career_ladder_kim
Fifteen years across three industries, three of them spent regretting a title she should have negotiated.
50 credit Contributor
- From answers
- 0
- From questions
- 51
- Lifetime
- 51
Two tools disagreeing by nineteen points on the same document tells you everything about the measurement. What they can usefully catch is mechanical: a file that turns to soup when parsed, dates in a format nothing recognises, contact details in a header that some parsers drop, and text living inside an image. Run one, fix anything in that category, ignore the score itself.
Only thing I would add is to make the bottom of your range a number you would genuinely accept, because that is the number they will hear. People give a range with an aspirational top and a survivable bottom and are then surprised by the offer.
This is what I coach people to do and it also removes the emotional weight. An hour spent on an application makes a rejection hurt, and that is what makes people stop applying.
Thirty minutes is the tell. The ones worth the money spend closer to ninety and half of it feels like an interrogation about things you thought were unremarkable.
Internship, if you genuinely mean non-academic. Four sections of teaching is 20 hours a week of work that appears on your CV as one line nobody outside a university will read. Twelve weeks in an industry research group gives you a reference who is not your advisor, a project you can describe in an interview without translating, and a realistic sense of whether you want that world. The catch is that summer is often the only block of uninterrupted analysis time you get, so ask yourself honestly whether your fifth year is a finishing year or a stalling year.
Then the internship costs you one summer of fitting models and buys you an entire job search network. Take it, and ask if they will let you keep two mornings a week for dissertation work. Half the people I know who did that were told yes because nobody had ever asked.
I did six years at 70-plus and then sold in a hurry at a worse price than I'd have got with a calm sale, because my health made the decision for me. The specific thing I'd tell year-two me is to take one full day completely off every week from the start, even when it's obviously impossible, and to get a proper check-up rather than assuming permanent exhaustion is the job. It is genuinely cheaper to hire six hours of cover than to sell a business in a bad month.
Worth pushing on. Mine took two GP appointments and a fairly blunt sentence about how long it had been going on before I got referred, and the referral was the thing that changed the year.
Frame it as your problem, not his failing: "I know term is brutal, so to keep myself moving I'll assume option A is fine unless you flag it by the 30th." Nobody has ever read that as an ultimatum in my department, and I have watched three people use it.
Stop sending chapters. A 40 page draft is a task he has to schedule; a two page memo is a task he can do while his coffee cools. Send: three bullet points on what you decided, two specific questions where you genuinely need his call, and one sentence saying you will proceed with option A unless you hear otherwise by a date. That last clause is the whole trick. It converts his silence from a blocker into permission, and most advisors will suddenly find twenty minutes rather than let you proceed on a choice they dislike.
Leverage moved mine and nothing else ever has. The two times my number went up meaningfully I had another process running and said so plainly, with a date attached. Not a threat, just a fact and a deadline: I have a decision to make by the eleventh and I would rather it be this one. Enthusiasm without an alternative reads as a signal that you will accept.
Three things, in the order they helped. I dropped to four days for a fixed three months, framed as a trial with a date attached, which made it much easier for my manager to say yes to than an open-ended request. I stopped answering anything after seven at night and told exactly two people, who then covered for me without being asked. And I gave up both committees I was on, which felt like career suicide and turned out to be invisible to everyone but me. The pay cut was real and it was still cheaper than the alternative.
Then buy on that and treat the electricity saving as a bonus. You'll be happier with the decision either way.
It also flushes out whether the band is real or decorative, which you want to know before you accept.
Before you buy anything, check speaker depth. Most helmets have recesses and if your speaker sits a few millimetres proud of the recess it presses on your ear all day and sounds worse because it's occluded. Moving mine forward, ahead of the ear canal rather than centred on it, improved clarity more than any upgrade did.
Anything involving repeat blood tests and dosing is genuinely a doctor conversation, and yours is already on it. Most of this thread is really about not wasting their time next winter.
Say the funding date out loud, early, and to each member individually before the group meeting. "My last funded month is May, so I'm planning to defend in March. Does that seem workable to you?" People behave differently when the constraint is a calendar rather than your stress level.
In practice nobody gets enforced against for a portfolio. But "nobody gets enforced against" is not a plan you can put under a client site.
The rebuild argument is more persuasive to me than the power one, honestly. Does the mirror leave me any expansion path at all?
Ask whether the delay started when your funding source changed. Mine slipped by exactly two weeks the month I moved from departmental funds to a grant line, because the grant reimburses in arrears and nobody had bridged the first cycle. Once that was known it was a one-time fix, not a monthly fight.